<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="issn">0000-0000</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>TMP  Universal Journal of Law, Business, and Management</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">0000-0000</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Twisting Memoirs Publication</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.69557/czc09t94</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>MUSK &amp;amp; DORSEY’S RADICAL “DELETE IP LAW” DEBATE: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF INNOVATION AND PROTECTION IN THE 21ST CENTURY</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Pethari</surname>
            <given-names>Ayushi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff-1">National Law University, Jabalpur </aff>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-10-17">
        <day>17</day>
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2025 TMP  Universal Journal of Law, Business, and Management</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
            <uri xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</uri></license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://ujlbm.twistingmemoirs.com/index.php/tmpujlbm/article/view/13"/>
      <abstract>
        <p>The recent proposal to repeal intellectual property (IP) rules by internet leaders Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey has provoked a heated discussion among academics, lawmakers, and business participants. Opponents caution that doing away with IP protections will upset established international treaties, destabilize global markets, and undermine incentives for creators, while supporters contend that doing so may spur innovation by breaking up monopolies and promoting open cooperation. This essay analyzes the "delete IP law" proposal critically, placing it within the context of intellectual property rights' historical development, assessing its possible effects on innovation ecosystems, and considering whether changes rather than abolition could be a more sensible course of action. Through doctrinal analysis, case studies, and comparative perspectives, the article concludes that outright abolition of IP law is impractical, but the debate underscores urgent need for recalibration of global IP frameworks in light of emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>Intellectual Property</kwd>
        <kwd>Innovation</kwd>
        <kwd>Abolition Debate</kwd>
        <kwd>Elon Musk</kwd>
        <kwd>Jack Dorsey</kwd>
        <kwd>IP  Reform</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
